The other day I was talking to Panger, and somewhere in our conversation we began discussing the media. She said that while religion used to be the "opiate of the masses," it's been replaced today by mass media (television, the internet, etc.).
She's right.
I went to ESPN after getting home on Wednesday night just to see what I
missed, and saw the newest poll they'd placed on the site.
The question: "Who is the Worst Super Bowl Quarterback of All Time?"
The choices:
You'll never guess who was leading the poll.
That's right, Rex Grossman.
What in the hell is wrong with you people!?
Rex Grossman isn't even the worst Bears quarterback in Super Bowl history, and they've only had two!!
Don't believe me? Let's look at the numbers. Here's the Punky QB known as McMahon's numbers from 1985:
178/313 56.9% 2,392 yards 15 TD 11 INT
Here's the Sex Cannon's numbers this season:
262/480 54.6% 3,193 yards 23 TD 20 INT
They're oddly similar. Rex threw for 801 more yards, and eight more touchdowns. His completion percentage was worse, and he threw more interceptions, but last I checked Rexy doesn't have Walter Payton in his backfield.
Also, there were quite a few games this season in which Rex won the game on his own, despite the defense. McMahon only won one game on his own in 85, against the Vikings in the Metrodome. A game he didn't even start. The defense on the '85 team was so good that Steve Fuller won games as the quarterback!!
Don't even get me started on the QB's Rex is considered worse than. Vince Ferragamo? David Woodley? Who the hell is David Woodley!? I don't even know. I had to look him up.

In 9 games for the Dolphins in 1982, Woodley threw for 1,080 yards, 5 touchdowns, and 8 interceptions. Average that out over a 16 game regular season and he'd finish with 1,920 yards, 9 touchdowns, and 14 interceptions.
Oh yeah, he's way better than Rex Grossman. Rex can't even carry his jock.
Tony Eason is worse than Grossman too. In 1985, before getting shellacked by the Bears, Eason had a regular season in which he threw 2,156 yards, 11 touchdowns, and 17 interceptions.
I know Rex is inconsistent. Trust me, he drives me crazy at times, but this is all just an overreaction to the insane amount of media coverage we have these days.
It's the ESPNs of the world spending 8 hours a day talking about how Rex sucks.
It's the Chicago newspapers, so accustomed to seeing crappy quarterbacks in this town that they aren't even sure what a good quarterback looks like, and just assume that Grossman sucks.
It's the bloggers like yours truly who rip on Rex at will. (Though I'd say Foul Balls been pretty fair to Grossman.)
People only see what they choose to, and all anybody looks at are Rex's bad games since that's what the media chooses to focus on.
They ignore his good games. Nobody looks at his performance against Detroit in Week 2 when he threw for 289 yards and four touchdowns, without an interception.
We glance over the game in Week 5 against Buffalo when Rex threw for 182 yards and 2 touchdowns in the first half en route to a 40-0 score at halftime. Rex did nothing but hand off in the second half.
They ignore his the Week 8 game against San Francisco where he threw for 3 touchdowns and 252 yards.
There was Week 10 in New York (246 yards, 3 touchdowns), Week 14 in St. Louis (200 yards, 2 touchdowns) and Week 15 against Tampa (339 yards, 2 touchdowns).
In those six games I mentioned, Rex threw 16 touchdowns, and 1 interception. It's just the fact that when Rex has a bad day, it's awful.
A quarterback who has gone 15-3 this season, and 20-8 in his career, is the worst quarterback in the history of the Super Bowl.
Give me a damn break.