I don't call other writers to task too often - besides Mariotti, anyway - but Bill Simmons wrote something earlier this week that just pissed me off.

Let me preface by saying, I'm not going to jump on the "Bill Simmons Sucks" bandwagon. I don't think he sucks. I just think that when he first popped up everybody thought he was awesome because he was the only person writing the way he does, as well as he does.
Now there are about 75 brazillian sports blogs out there, all written Simmons-style, and he's become a little dispensable. So there's a backlash against him for not changing what he writes about by a bunch of other bloggers who never change what they write about either.
It's funny.
Anyway, I was reading his latest Basketball Blog and saw he mentioned the Bulls. I was interested to hear his take on my favorite basketball team.
The talk, as was all talk of the Bulls at the time, centered around them not pulling the trigger on Pau Gasol. Simmons felt the Bulls made a mistake not making a deal, and he also questioned the signing of Ben Wallace, and subsequent trade of Tyson Chandler.
This is what pissed me off:
The Bulls overpaid Ben Wallace and acquired P.J. Brown's expiring deal specifically to make a bigger move this season ... and then they did nothing. Well, why not just keep Tyson Chandler then? Have you seen his numbers in New Orleans the past few weeks? He's averaging 17 rebounds a game this month. How can anyone claim the Bulls didn't botch this scenario to smithereens? Chandler makes two-thirds as much money as Wallace AND he's 10 years younger AND he's getting better (and not worse). Am I missing anything?
Maybe it's just my undying hatred for the toothpick known as Tyson Chandler, but I think that Simmons is missing something, and what he's missing completely negates what he said.

Tyson Chandler (who just happens to be making his return to Chicago with the Hornets tonight) would never have had the kind of season he's having with the NOOCH with the Chicago Bulls. It's impossible.
First, I'm pretty sure Scott Skiles hated Tyson, so he would never be getting the playing time here.
Second, I'm not the only Bulls fan that hates Chandler. There was so much weight put on the shoulders of Chandler and fellow high schooler Eddy Curry when they were drafted to turn the franchise around. There was no way that either could live up to what Bulls fans were promised, especially as a couple of 18-year olds.
Not to mention Chandler came to Chicago via a trade that saw Elton Brand (you know, one of those low post scorers the Bulls could really use right now) go to the Clippers. That trade was probably the second dumbest thing former GM Jerry Krause ever did, behind only his decision to tell MJ, Pip, and Phil that the Bulls didn't need them anymore.
As a result, Bulls fans hated Krause, and when they say Chandler and Curry, guess who they thought of? That's right. Jerry Fucking Krause.
So, yes, Bill. You were missing something.
Other than that, though, I agree with Simmons. The Bulls do need a low post scorer. I'm just not sure why everybody is so in love with Gasol. Yes he can score, but he's also injury prone, a defensive liability and, last I checked, he's never led the Grizzlies to a postseason victory. So why he's been portrayed as the second coming of Karl Malone, I don't know.
The thing is, there is just no way that John Paxson could trade a combination of Luol Deng, Ben Gordon, or Kirk Hinrich and still sleep at night.

Ben Gordon is a scoring machine, and nobody knows how good Luol Deng is going to be, just that he's already awesome and getting better. Hinrich is having a down season, but that could easily be attributed to his summer with Team USA.
We seem to forget that the three of them are 23, 21, and 26 years old respectively. The Bulls have time to win an NBA title, and let's be honest, the Eastern Conference sucks this year; it's entirely possible the Bulls could get to the Finals this season without a big man.
Sure Ben Wallace will be a year older next season, but I don't see that as being as big a deal as everyone thinks. Especially if the Bulls do what I think they're going to do this offseason.

I really believe that Kevin Garnett will be wearing a Chicago Bulls jersey next year, especially after
what he said about his opt-out clause last week. The Bulls could part with any of a combination of players between Deng, Andres Nocioni, Tyrus Thomas, and of course, the Knicks draft pick. I love Luol Deng, but I don't mind trading him if we get KG in return, and depending on the draft pick, we may not have to trade Deng. I'm sure a package of the #1 or #2 (read Greg Oden or Kevin Durant) plus Nocioni, Tyrus Thomas, and a contract would be good enough for the Timberwolves.
If you put KG in a Bulls jersey along with Gordon, Hinrich, Ben Wallace, and whoever's left at the three, you have your Eastern Conference favorite.
And no, I am
not high.