We Do Love Our Quarterback Controversy
A few weeks ago when Lovie Smith stood at a podium and announced that "Brian Griese is our quarterback" most people probably thought that it would mark the end of any quarterback controversy in the city of Chicago. They were wrong. This is Chicago, where the quarterback with the clipboard in his hand is always better than the one with the ball in his.
So while Brian Griese isn't going to be losing his job anytime soon, in the college ranks we have a couple of local controversies.
We'll start first with the one that's just an emotional reaction, should the Illini bench Juice Williams in favor of Eddie McGee? My answer here is no.
The only reason anybody's talking about change for the Illini is because they lost this weekend, and they looked bad doing it. That said, the loss wasn't Juice Williams' fault. Kirk Ferentz coached that Iowa defense all week preparing them for the option attack of Illinois, and they did a fantastic job of stopping an offense that had looked unstoppable before then.
Give the Hawkeyes credit, they came up with a game plan, and then they executed it flawlessly.
When you look at Juice's numbers on the season, they aren't particularly impressive. He's only completed 55.5% of his passes for 716 yards. That's 102.2 yards passing a game, but considering how often Illinois throws the ball, that's not really a bad number. Williams also has five touchdowns to match his five interceptions.
So, no, Juice Williams is not now, nor will he probably ever be, the type of quarterback who's going to win a game with his arm. That doesn't mean the Illini need to make a change.
Eddie McGee is basically just a Juice clone, except he's taller. His best asset is his legs, not his arm. Though when watching McGee play, I get the impression he has a more accurate arm, but the numbers don't back it up. Juice has completed 55.5% of his passes, but McGee's only completed 52.4% of his. He's also thrown three interceptions compared to just one touchdown pass.
In other words, McGee is a very good backup to have because if Juice gets hurt-which tends to happen with Juice-the team doesn't really lose anything when McGee comes in. At the same time, they don't get better either. So if the team doesn't get any better with McGee in the game, there's no need for Ron Zook (who just got an extension) to make a change.
No, where the change needs to be made is in South Bend. I've written about this at FanHouse already, but Evan Sharpley needs to be named the starter at Notre Dame. I have nothing against Jimmy Clausen. I don't think he sucks, I don't think he's going to be a huge recruiting bust for Charlie Weis, I just don't think he's ready to be the quarterback now.
The surgery he had in the offseason is obviously still affecting Clausen's arm. When Clausen is in the game Notre Dame's offense is limited to intermediate routes and passes out to the flat. In other words, nothing that could cause Clausen to hurt his arm.
Whenever Sharpley's come in, he's provided an immediate spark for the Irish offense. He nearly led the Irish to a comeback victory at Purdue, and the only offensive touchdown the Irish scored last Saturday against Boston College came when Sharpley replaced Clausen.
Charlie Weis said earlier this week that he would make his decision today, and as of the moment, he still hasn't announced his decision.
He's considering Sharpley, but he says he wants to see Sharpley perform better in practice before giving him the starting job.
"If he wants to move past Jimmy, which I know he does, it's got to be an every day thing, it can't just be a game day thing," he said.I understand what Weis is saying here, it is important that Sharpley plays well in practice. Where I disagree is why it's necessary this late in the season. Yes, if this was still spring ball, and Sharpley was being outperformed by Clausen in practice, then naming Sharpley starter would be idiotic.
But the Irish are seven games into their season right now, and they're 1-6. In those seven games the team has played better when Sharpley was taking the snaps. Last I checked, it's the performances in games that players and teams get credit for, not practice.
I've spent a lot of time wondering how I really feel about Charlie Weis. I wanted to make sure that my feelings were based more on what I thought of him as a coach than how the team has been performing so far. This issue is making me question Charlie's ability to actually run a football team.
If Charlie Weis can't see that Sharpley is his teams only chance to beat USC this weekend, and it's an incredibly remote chance, then why should I ever believe he's going to lead this team back where it belongs?What Weis needs to realize that benching Clausen isn't admitting failure, either as a coach or a recruiter. It just means that your freshman quarterback isn't ready yet, something that happens everywhere, and he would be better served on the sidelines letting his arm heal while learning the offense better.
Benching Clausen would do less to hurt his confidence than throwing him out there every week to be eaten alive ever will.
Let's just hope Charlie can see past his pride, and make the right decision.
UPDATE: Charlie made the right decision.



1
2