I haven't written about the Bears much at all lately, for obvious reasons, but I'm very pleased the team has given me something to write about today. On Monday afternoon the news broke that the Bears were releasing both Muhsin Muhammad and Fred Miller.
Thank you, Jesus. (Or should I thank Allah?)
They also signed Alex Brown to a two-year contract extension.
With the release of Miller, the Bears offensive line is automatically better, as Fred looked more like an open gate this season than a right tackle.
As for the release of Muhammad, it wasn't entirely unexpected, but before yesterday's announcement there had been no word it was coming.
To release Moose was the right move by the Bears. When he signed his big contract here in 2005, Moose was coming off a season in Carolina where he made 93 catches, gained 1,405 yards and caught 16 touchdowns.
In three seasons with the Bears, Moose caught 164 passes (his high for a season, 64 in 2005), for 2,183 yards and 12 touchdowns. Not exactly the type of production the Bears were hoping for.
Of course it could be argued that Moose didn't have much of a chance in Chicago. After all, he was forced to catch passes from NFL greats like Rex Grossman, Kyle Orton, and Brian Griese. At the same time though, it could be argued that great wide receivers make quarterbacks better.
Would Tony Romo be so dreamy if he didn't have Terrell Owens to throw to? Hell, even Tom Brady benefited from having Randy Moss. He was already great before Randy came to New England, but in 2007 Tom threw 50 touchdown passes after never throwing more than 28 in a season without him (Dreamboat did it twice, in 2002 and 2004).
Moose, whether the expectations were fair or not, was supposed to be that kind of player for the Bears, but instead he was just another in a long line of mediocre receivers who have passed through our glorious city.
With Moose now out of the picture, the question becomes: What the hell are the Bears going to do with their receiving corps now?
Well, it's pretty obvious at this point that Bernard Berrian will be having a franchise tag slapped on him in the very near future. I don't think he'll mind it as much as Lance Briggs either. Bernard had a bit of a disappointing season in 2007 after showing a lot of promise in 2008, so a year as the clearly defined #1 receiver in Chicago could help him get back some of the money he would have lost on the free agent market this season.
After Bernard, the cupboard's pretty bare.
The depth chart now looks like this:
- Berrian
- Mark Bradley
- Devin Hester
- Rashied Davis
Doesn't exactly inspire a lot of confidence, does it?
So where does the team go from here? Well, former Bear Marty Booker was recently released by the Miami Dolphins, and there are rumors
he could be coming back here, but he isn't the answer. Still, given the fact that there aren't very many attractive options on the free agent market this offseason, and the team has other more pressing needs to address in the draft, Booker could be a nice stopgap option.

You know what would be insane, though? The previously mentioned Randy Moss is a free agent this offseason, and he has intimated that he'd like a big contract. So it doesn't look like he's going to take a smaller deal to stay on with the Patriots.
Would the Bears have the balls to go after Randy? Would it be the smart thing to do?
I think they have to try. They have room under the salary cap to make such a deal if they really wanted to, and adding Moss to the team might solve the quarterback problem all by itself. (Not to mention that if they did sign Moss, they could easily let Berrian go as well.) Think about it, what's the one pass that Rex Grossman can consistently throw?
The deep ball.
Who in the history of the NFL is a better deep threat than Randy Moss?
Imagine the possibilities. Berrian and Moss are both deep threats that opposing defenses have to respect, and that would create a ton of room for the Bears offense. Greg Olson could flourish over the middle of the field against linebackers that would be forced to cover him, and Devin Hester would find plenty of space to maneuver.
Not to mention that it would force teams to stop putting 8 men in the box all the time, which could only help the Bears ground game.
It's a pipe dream, I know, but it's a wonderful one to have.
Foul Balls
It's Time To Say Goodbye To Ben Gordon - I've written
about it before, but with the recent barrage of big trades taking place in the NBA recently, I'd like to revisit the topic.
The NBA trade deadline is quickly approaching, and I hope that John Paxson is currently working the phones trying to trade Ben Gordon. I know John has said in the past that he'd like to keep Gordon here long term, but that just doesn't make any sense. If Gordon wanted to be in Chicago long term, he'd have taken the $50 million extension the team offered him in the offseason.
With Thabo Sefolosha continuing to grow into a strong NBA player, the need for Gordon on this team becomes less necessary. There has to be somebody in the Western Conference who wouldn't mind adding a scorer like Ben to their team for what's going to be a very exciting stretch run to finish the NBA season.
I suggest Paxson makes the move now before Ben walks away for nothing later.
Bobby Howry Early Favorite To Close - Lou Piniella has been saying for a while now that the position of closer on the Cubs in 2008 will be a three-horse race between Bobby Howry, Kerry Wood, and Carlos Marmol, with the winner being decided in spring training.
Of course, that hasn't stopped the media from continually asking him who the closer is going to be despite the fact that nobody has thrown a pitch this spring. So it's not surprising that on Monday Lou let it slip that he's
leaning more towards Howry right now based on the performance he gave in the role last season filling in for an injured Ryan Dempster.
Cubs manager Lou Piniella has been careful not to handicap the three-way race for closer, preferring to let Kerry Wood, Bob Howry and Carlos Marmol compete with no preconceived notions of where they stand.
But in an interview Sunday night on WGN-Ch. 9, Piniella acknowledged Howry is the early favorite based on the job he did subbing for Ryan Dempster in 2007 and the fact that Wood's durability is unknown.
Personally, I don't know why there hasn't been more talk about Minnesota closer Joe Nathan. Nathan is entering the last year of his contract with the Twins, and since Minnesota isn't going to be competing for the AL Central title this year, keeping one of the game's premier closers doesn't seem to make much sense.

Nathan has said he'd like to stay in Minnesota and work out a new deal, but I don't see the Twins committing that kind of money to him. So why doesn't Jim Hendry give the Twins a call to see what it would take to get him?
If you think the Cubs bullpen is strong now, imagine what it would be like with Nathan at the back end? The Cubs would essentially be shortening the game to 6 innings. Plus, since Nathan is in the final year of his contract, the Cubs could just let him go after the season, get some draft picks, and install Marmol as their new closer in 2009.