Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Martin Havlat Speaks His Mind

Ever since news broke late Monday night that the Blackhawks were replacing Dale Tallon as general manager with Stan Bowman, former Blackhawk Martin Havlat has been a Tweeting machine on his Twitter page. He's been letting his thoughts be heard in 140 character or less bursts.

Here are some examples of what Havlat had to say.
I guess everyone saw what happened to Dale....yes, the story is starting to come out but it's just the tip of the iceberg.

Lot's of people are telling me to stay quiet but shouldn't the fans know the truth? It's your loyalty, season ticket money and emotions here

What do you people think? Interested to know your thoughts.

Just so everyone begins to understand, Dale was like a 2nd father to me.

Want to be clear. I loved my time in Chicago but moved on. Very excited about Minny,going to give everything I have to the Wild.


Well, it seems Marty got tired of having to confine his thoughts on the subject on Twitter, so he decided to give TSN's Darren Dreger an exclusive interview about his feelings on the Tallon firing. Havlat did not hold back.

"My negotiation with Chicago was not between Dale and my agent, it was between Dale and McDonough," Havlat said "Why? Because McDonough couldn't stand that Dale was so successful and getting the credit for building the Hawks from a last place team to making the Conference Final in three short years. Remember, we were also the youngest team in the NHL last year."

"I was too closely identified with Dale," he continued. "McDonough knew long ago he was going to fire Dale. He wanted someone he could claim as his own He wanted to stand up at the convention and claim credit for signing this guy or that guy."

Havlat's candor won't be easily accepted by the Blackhawks, and there may be claims of this being nothing more than the backlash of a jilted player, but Havlat's appreciation for Dale Tallon is what drove him to speak up mere hours after Tallon's firing was confirmed.

"Dale and I were very close and I stand for loyalty. The players loved Dale and they are with him. Every single player on that team is with Dale. I still talk to the guys all the time, hockey players know a phony when they see one."

"I was part of a very special team but that team doesn't exist anymore. I am really disappointed that Rocky Wirtz would let something like this happen," Havlat told TSN.ca.
Well then.

I'm not really sure which side to take on this story. While I'm not entirely sure why Tallon was let go, I can't be sure that Havlat isn't just bitter at this point. As he said on his Twitter page and in the TSN interview, Tallon was like a second father to him and they were very close. So it's likely he's just upset that something like this happened to somebody he cares about.

There's also the fact that Marty thought he was going to be getting a big multi-year deal from the Blackhawks and instead that money went to Marian Hossa.

There's also Havlat's contention that McDonough did all of this so he could take credit for "signing this guy or that guy" at the convention this weekend and be a hero for the fans. Well, if you listened to the press conference yesterday in which the Tallon firing was announced, McDonough made it clear a number of times that he has absolutely nothing to do with any player decisions, saying "I know what I don't know."

Doesn't sound like somebody hogging all the credit to me.

Blackhawks color commentator Eddie Olczyk had some pretty harsh words of his own this morning about the situation, but his were reserved for Havlat. Appearing on ESPN1000's Waddle and Silvy show Olczyk went off on Havlat a bit himself.

Now I can't remember what Eddie O. said word for word because I only heard it the once and they haven't replayed it, but to paraphrase, here you go. Basically Olczyk said that Havlat came to Chicago as an extremely overpaid player who had trouble staying healthy. The Hawks gave him a chance here, and he was hurt all the time except last season, which happened to be a contract year for Havlat.

Olczyk then went on to say that if Havlat loved Chicago so much he could have just signed a one-year deal with the Blackhawks to prove to the team he could stay healthy and that he wanted to be here.

Instead he bristled at the idea and took a deal with the Minnesota Wild.

Like I said earlier, I'm not sure how to feel about this thing. While I think there's some truth to what Havlat is saying, I think a lot of it is just sour grapes. At the same time, I don't really buy the story the Blackhawks are selling either.

Listening to their answers during yesterday's press conference, there were some things said that seemed to contradict other things that were said in the same press conference. I mean, in one sentence McDonough said that if the restricted free agent fiasco hadn't happened, Tallon would "probably" still be the general manager.

Then a minute later he was saying the blame for the offer sheets laid with the entire organization, but ultimately, himself.

So frankly I don't think either side is being completely honest with us about it, and if I'm going to be completely honest about it, I'll just say that I can't wait for next season to start so the Blackhawks can start winning some games and we can all just move on.

9 comments:

  1. There seem to be two separate issues here. Sure, Havlat may be stirring the pot. But his sour grapes don't necessarily negate the truth of what he says.

    I would have written most of this off until I heard the interview Stan Bowman did yesterday afternoon with the Afternoon Saloon. It really bugged me and has given me some worries about what has just gone down.

    In the interview, Bowman was, in my opinion, dispassionate to the point of being disconnected. Humorless with rehearsed rote responses (a White House press secretary wouldn't be able to do as much evading), he made me very uncomfortable.

    The biggest red flag, though, was his statement that, unlike Tallon, he was a numbers guy, a "by the book" administrator. Do NOT like the idea of an MBA mentality guiding NHL decisions. When your primary asset is the good will of your players, mutual respect and, yes, some affection, can play an enormous role in keeping a team on the right path. This guy has the personality of week-old bread. Not exactly someone who's going to create strong bonds with a group of testosterone and ego-filled young superstars.

    Finally, I'm left with this lingering concern. Bowman is the self-proclaimed numbers guy, right? As such, he is the person most logically responsible for the botched filings. (Lots of rumors swirling around about that.) So it's not Tallon's fault but he's gone because of it? Hmmmmm....

    Part of me believes Tallon got shiv'ed by this guy and that the the Blackhawks now have a corporate Iago on their hands.

    Hope I'm wrong. Otherwise, beware, cuz "chaos is come again."
    ReplyDelete
  2. Panger, I get your concerns, I do, but I don't agree with them.

    A general manager's job in the NHL is about putting together a team that can win a Stanley Cup, and to manage the salary cap.

    That's it.

    His job is not to be best friends with the players. In fact, developing a personal relationship with the players can actually hinder his ability to perform the job.

    He may re-sign a guy that he'd be better off letting go because he likes him. Like Havlat for example.

    He and Tallon were very close, so maybe Tallon wanted to give him the big deal he was after, but reality says that this is a bad idea.

    Havlat has a tough time staying healthy, and showed that in Ottawa and Chicago. Did he have a great season last year? Yeah, but does one good season wipe out the last few years where he spent the lion's share of the season hurt?

    No.

    Personally I think you're letting your feelings for Havlat cloud your judgement on what's going on here.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Honestly, I'm not. Havlat is old news now, history. He's got pretty much nothing to do with what I wrote.

    And by no means am I saying that being "buddy buddy" with the players is a job requirement for GM. Indeed, as you stated, it's probably a net negative to be too close to the team members you need to make hard decisions about.

    What I am saying is that there is a net positive in having good working relationships with players. His interviews did not exactly inspire me to believe that will be happening.

    And my bigger point was that it's critical to have a representative of your team who is truly looking after your interests. I don't presume to have the slightest understanding of what's going on in the front offices of the Blackhawks, so in truth, I have nothing substantive to offer here. Just some vague uneasiness based on a messy press conference, an Asperger-inspired Afternoon Saloon appearance, rumors in the newspapers about his involvement in the botched filings... and a little business acumen of my own.

    Time will tell.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, well as far as Bowman being "dispassionate" all I can say is I'm not exactly surprised that a guy who just finished an hour long press conference and then started doing radio interviews directly afterward would not be full of energy.

    I mean, what did you want him to do? Start screaming at the top of his lungs and proclaiming the Blackhawks the greatest team in history?

    How many radio interviews have you heard with GMs where they're NOT giving standard cookie-cutter answers?

    I mean, talks with Dale Tallon on the radio weren't exactly must-hear events.

    He gave the same kind of answers Bowman did.

    And rumors in various papers -- hey, surely the Boston Globe knows more about what's going on in Chicago than our papers do and it's oddly surprising that the Sun-Times pulled it's story isn't it -- are the same as rumors on the internet.

    They're rumors from unnamed sources.

    And as far as any possible concerns about Bowman's ability to do the job, well, he was Tallon's assistant for the last 8 years. I highly doubt that Tallon did all the scouting of young players around the globe alone. Bowman had a hand in there as well.

    Plus he's had a lifetime of learning from his father, who last I checked, knows a thing or two about the sport.

    But as I said in the article, I'm not really sure how to feel about all of this. I'm somewhat of the opinion that everybody is making a lot bigger deal of all this than it really is because we're in that dead zone of sports news in the summer as MLB has its all-star break.

    There's just nothing else to talk about right now, so everybody is talking about this.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Probably. Like I said, time will tell.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Though I gotta say, his father knowing "a thing or two" about the game doesn't mean much to me. Lot of sons follow in their successful fathers' footsteps. Few are as good. Nepotism just gives you the "in" - has no bearing on how successful you're going to be in the job. (Think George W. Bush.)
    ReplyDelete
  7. Get what you're saying, but when the Hawks hired Stan Bowman 8 years ago at the age of 28, they did it with all this in mind.

    They've been grooming him.

    And also there's a slight difference in running the country and a hockey team. :)
    ReplyDelete
  8. Unfortunately for the country, there sure is.

    Meanwhile, waiting expectantly for Blanket Jackson's debut CD.
    ReplyDelete
  9. Panger using GWB as an example? HA!
    ReplyDelete

Try to play nice with each other, or else I will remove your comment.

Follow by Email